Post Processing
It is highly debated and often misunderstood. One of our members recently showed me where some photographers where complaining about the top candidates in a photography competition. The argument, as is the argument with many such things was if processes like colorization, HDR, and other such options should be allowed in competitions like that. So what is the difference between photography and digital art? Well I can tell you that I do not feel like I have the ability nor the right to decide that for you. I would say that if it started in the camera and is comprised of 1 or more photos, it is a photograph or a composite of photographs...
Over the years I have seen my idea of photography change. I don't know if it is the fact that I have learned how to create a technically sound exposure in the camera or if it is because I have learned how to take my shots to the next level. As i stated in a previous blog, my goal,
every time, is to get it right in camera. The perfect exposure for that scene... That exposure will give me greater leeway when I get to the computer and will give me a much broader ability to finish the image.
 |
| Bad Editing Example |
Now we have all seen this type of image (right). IMO it is an extreme example of over processed and does not represent what I would want my work to be.
Processing has changed over the years but in many ways the the ideas for many photographers is still the same. First, create an image that makes you feel, create an image that is pleasing to the eye for others, create an image that tells a story... Photographers have been using on camera filters for years. polarizing, ND's, Warming, cooling, golds, and other colored filters. Some are used today and some have been duplicated in software.
History:
Photo manipulation has been around for a LONG time as seen in the iconic image above and right. Believe it or not the Holy Grail of purist photography used to allow a lot more editing than they do these days. This image of a National Geographic actually had the photo manipulated to fit the cover here. Think Content aware fill in Photoshop... But this was film in 1982.
Now do not get me wrong, I am not bashing the true Purist out there by any means. The photographers that have learned their craft over several decades and know what they are about. even they know that a digital camera is incapable of capturing the full gamut of colors seen by the human eye. And yes, they do use photoshop or other software to color correct, dodge, and burn.
Ansel Adams, often referred to as one of the best visual communicators ever, used red filters to turn the sky black in many of his early works. Ironically the same works that made him famous to start with (pre group f/64)
So are you beginning to see what I am getting at yet? Is processing an image for visual benefit a good or bad thing? I use it, I like it. Would Adams have used photoshop?
Read this article and you be the judge.
http://focusonphotography.blogspot.com/2008/07/ansel-adams-and-lone-pine-photograph.html
 |
| Post 10 minute edit |
 |
| Pre Edit |
These Images show a some what strong handed approach to editing but one necessary to create the visual effect and draw the eyes to the main point and not the distractions
Winners
I would like to take the opportunity to congratulate our recent winners
Pete Watson brought life to spring with his Spring in Black and White high key.
Pete, a photographer for over 30 years spends his time with his family and giving to kids as a mentor and foster parent
I could write about Pete's ability with a camera but after reading a short Bio about Pete all I can say is what stand up guy. You just cant beat a guy like that. He fits in perfect with with this amazing group! Welcome Pete and Congrats!
Richard Yarbrough wheels us over with these rusty old train wheels.
Richard, Ohhh Richard... what can ya say about Richard... Well besides he takes amazing photos and does not even have to leave his front porch to do so. I seriously log into FB just to see if Richard has posted a picture that morning...